This picture, for some reason really made me wonder, what happened to the North wall of WTC1?
This is the wall that would have faced WTC6, and is supposedly what fell down and made this huge gaping hole in WTC6:
The problem is that there really wasn't much in the bottom of that hole in WTC6:
Picture from here.
And the bottom of WTC6 didn't cave in because the parking garage under WTC6 was still intact!
Picture from here.
The Northern wall of WTC1 was a rather massive structure:
1360 feet tall
206 feet wide
of 14 inch thick steel box columns.
The only place it realistically could have gone is into WTC6.
But think about it-- if you chopped up this wall of steel into nice 100 foot by 50 foot sections, and then stacked them up, you'd have a 63.5 foot pile.
In an ideal situation.
If you threw this wall down, so that it fell into a jumble, it would easily be twice as tall-- over 100 feet of debris.
WHERE THE HELL DID ALL THAT STEEL GO????????
It is not in the WTC6 hole-- heck there is not even enough debris in there for the collapsed 8 stories of WTC6!
The wall is not in the footprint of WTC1.
It is, for all intents and purposes, the steel of the north wall is GONE.
The only conceivable explanation is that, indeed, some high-energy weapon disintegrated the steel as it fell, at the same time making huge holes in WTC6.
The other reason this makes sense is that the north wall of WTC1 was predicted to fall right ON THE EDGE OF THE BATHTUB surroundong the WTC complex. Thus, whoever planned the demolition was sure to take extra precuation not to have this massive mega-ton wall fall right on the edeg of the bath-tub.
Keep in mind, when they "pulled down" WTC6, they were very careful to do it so it wouldn't damage the bathtub. This was a major concern.
If the 8 story remnants of WTC6 were a worry to damage the bathtub when it fell down, how exactly was it that the mega-ton WTC1 north wall didn't destroy the bathtub when it came down?
The only possible explanation is that the wall was disintegrated as WTC1 came down.